Omar Cooper
NYJ

Omar Cooper

WRBye Wk 13● HealthyMarket ADP 181 · WR74
Updated Sep 3, 2026
Per-game floor / ceiling · half-PPRProj. games: 15.6 / 17
Floor4.1
Proj.5.4
Ceiling8.4
AI outlook

Rd1/Pick30 rookie buried behind Wilson/Mitchell on a low-volume Jets offense (5.5 win total); near-replacement-level PPR expectation; TD rate due for regression; role unresolved pending camp/preseason usage.

Recent news

No recent news on file.

Strengths & concerns
Pros / cons +

Pros

  • Round 1 (Pick 30) draft capital
  • Elite 2025 college volume (69-937-13, Big Ten YPR leader)
  • Strong after-catch ability (~40% forced missed tackle rate)
  • Versatile alignment + low drop rate (4.0%)

Cons

  • Buried behind entrenched WR1 Garrett Wilson
  • Direct competition with Mitchell/Patrick for remaining snaps
  • Low-volume, bottom-tier Jets offense (5.5 win total)
  • 2025 college TD rate (18.8%) due for regression
  • No 2026 preseason target/snap data yet
Why our rank differs from ADP
agree

Market prices Rd1 (Pick 30) draft capital; our model docks him for being buried behind Wilson/Mitchell/Patrick on a low-volume Jets offense.

Full breakdown +

Market ADP (181) leans on Omar Cooper's Round 1/Pick 30 draft capital and strong 2025 college production (69-937-13, Big Ten YPR leader). Our model ranks him lower (225) because the stored profile flags an unresolved opportunity path: pros/cons list him as "buried behind entrenched WR1 Garrett Wilson" with "direct competition with Mitchell/Patrick for remaining snaps" on a "low-volume, bottom-tier Jets offense (5.5 win total)," plus "no 2026 preseason target/snap data yet"; confidence_tier is "low" and ai_summary/outlook both describe near-replacement-level projections pending camp/preseason usage. The cons also flag his 2025 college TD rate (18.8%) as due for regression, consistent with td_regression_check noting he is weighted off draft capital/college profile since there is no NFL usage sample yet. Cross-check against fantasy-football-analyst-foundation (slug, same project): the doc states "Opportunity beats efficiency, always" and lists target share/route participation as "sticky" while TD rate is explicitly "not sticky (regress hard, don't chase)"; it also names "Depth Chart/Camp" contested-role battles as a required layered factor alongside draft capital/pedigree. This supports our divergence: the model is weighting his unresolved, contested opportunity and unstable TD rate over the market's draft-capital anchoring. Analyst_foundation_check: supports.

Our model
Market ADP?181
Blended rank?218
Consensus rank?159
Tier?Tier 16
VBD score?-52.1
Risk profile

Coming soon — we're rebuilding this rating from scratch to make it more accurate.

Projected PPG
Standard4.1
Half-PPR5.4
Full PPR6.7
Confidence tier
Low