TreVeyon Henderson

Market (ADP 51) discounts Henderson for being a true committee back - Stevenson holds early-down and passing-down trust, and Henderson graded 34th/40 RBs in PFF pass-block, capping his 3rd-down role. Our model (rank 39, +12 vs ADP) leans on his explosive-play profile as a rookie: 4 rush TDs of 50+ yards, 30 missed tackles forced, and 5.1 YPC (8th among qualifying RBs) - efficiency that held up independent of the O-line. Team commentary (per profile) points to more tempo/red-zone emphasis in 2026, which plays to a big-play back even within a shared workload. Counterweight: 2025 TD production was heavily bunched (9 of 10 TDs in 4 games), an explicit regression flag in the stored profile - confidence_tier is medium and games_played sample is 15.5, consistent with rookie-year variance rather than an established rate. Analyst-foundation cross-check: SUPPORTS. The foundation doc's process explicitly calls for flagging TD-rate regression candidates ("Flag TD-rate and other regression candidates explicitly - state the expected reversion direction") and ranks "opportunity beats efficiency" as the top philosophy - both align with how this profile is reasoned (role/opportunity-based outlook, explicit TD-regression caveat) rather than chasing last year's raw TD total. The doc does not contain RB-specific committee-role guidance beyond this general principle, so the check is a general-principle match, not a position-specific one.